* Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org> wrote:
quoted text > > This should be foiled to the first patch in the patchset. No good
> > reason to push a patch that might cause a problem.
>
> The reason is, that in my experience, Ingo prefers update patches
> instead replacements once he has merged something.
yeah, that's very true - but i can also fold back things if it's done in
a reasonably short amount of time, when there's no other commits mixed
in inbetween. (as in this case)
Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86: make gart_alloc_coherent return zeroed memory , Ingo Molnar , (Thu Aug 21, 11:41 pm)