Ingo Molnar wrote:
quoted text > uhm, why is this even a question? All of this stuff is so deep inside
> the guts of the kernel ... so nope - if then we want to change the
> others to _GPL exports as well, just to make sure nobody gets funny
> ideas.
pv_lock_ops gets accessed by inline functions which get inlined into
modules. They should never directly access it, but the generated code
will. _spin_lock() is in exactly the same situation.
J
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] x86: export pv_lock_ops non-GPL , Jeremy Fitzhardinge , (Thu Aug 21, 9:25 am)