On Thu, 21 Aug 2008, Linus Torvalds wrote:Ok, I have looked at the draft now, and I don't think I was overly pessimistic. If I read it right, all the memory ordering operations are defined for _single_ objects. So if you want to do the kernel kind of memory ordering where you specify ordering requirements independently of the actual accesses (perhaps because the accesses are in some helper function that doesn't care, but then you want to "finalize" the thing by stating a sequence point), it seems to be impossible with current drafts. Oh, well. Nothing lost. I didn't expect the thing to work. Linus --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| WANG Cong | Re: WANTED: kernel projects for CS students |
| Hiten Pandya | Re: up? (emacs docbook xml ide) |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #10606] 2.6.26-rc1 regression: ACPI fails to load SDT. - Dell M1530 |
| David Fenyes | sigsetmask()? (LINUX) |
| X X | X11 GIf viewer somewhere? |
| root | Broken pipe when using reboot/halt, etc. |
| Stephen Tweedie | Unmounting root (no kidding!) [was: Some Linux problems---solved] |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: iptables very slow after commit784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
