Hello Jared,

On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 4:19 PM, Jared Hulbert <jaredeh@gmail.com> wrote:
quoted text
>> FWIW, I'm not sure it's a good idea to name this new filesystem AXFS.
>> People are almost certainly going to confuse it with XFS despite
>
People that care about their filesystem choice know their choices.
People that don't
care, well they don't care.

Maybe AXIPFS would be the close alternative.

One question on the use-case profiling and subsequent image rebuild:

What if the use-case did not cover all cases of XIP use?

If a compressed page is attempted to be executed, will the filesystem
fall back to decompression to RAM and execution from RAM, or will this
result in a faulty system?

The design choices look real good. Congrats on the achievement.

Regards,
-- 
Leon
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/