On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:21:11PM +0300, =3D?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ilpo_J=3DE4rvine=
n_ wrote:
quoted text
> Hmm, there was no explanation why the tp->rx_buf_sz to pkt_size change
> was made in that commit (I have no idea whether those sizes have to match=
=20
quoted text
> to other places that use tp->rx_buf_sz)... Below is a patch to revert=20
> that part of the change fully though it could be enough to change just=20
> pci_unmap_single arg (but that would probably need also=20
> rtl8169_mark_to_asic arg to be changed to match pkt_size).
>=20

Excellent, with the patch applied transfers over NFS seem to be going
smoothly.

quoted text
> > Below you'll find a list of files referenced from REPORTING-BUGS that
> > are meant to be helpful, including the lspci and module information,
> > they can all be reached from the toplevel directory index
>=20
> Thanks for the detailed report btw... :-)

Thanks :) I was more than just a little intimidated by my first post to
LKML, and I wanted to make sure the first reply to my report wasn't that I
didn't have enough info, or that I presented it in the wrong way, or
hadn't done enough testing with it. I was also more than prepared to
wait weeks for someone to reply, so thanks for the quick return! :D

tjfontaine