Re: [discuss] memrlimit - potential applications that can use

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Dave Hansen
Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 - 9:38 am

On Wed, 2008-08-20 at 15:25 +0200, righi.andrea@gmail.com wrote:

I completely disagree. :)

Think of all the work Eric Biederman did on pid namespaces.  One of his
motivations was to keep /proc from being able to pin task structs.  That
is one great example of a way a process can pin lots of memory without
mapping it, and overcommit has no effect on this!

Eric had a couple of other good examples, but I think task structs were
the biggest.

As I said to Balbir, there probably are some large-scale solutions to
this: things like beancounters.  

-- Dave

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[discuss] memrlimit - potential applications that can use, Balbir Singh, (Tue Aug 19, 12:18 am)
Re: [discuss] memrlimit - potential applications that can use, Dave Hansen, (Wed Aug 20, 9:38 am)
Re: [discuss] memrlimit - potential applications that can use, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Aug 21, 12:43 am)
Re: [discuss] memrlimit - potential applications that can use, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki, (Thu Aug 21, 3:59 am)