Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, <tokunaga.keiich@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 20, 2008 - 10:10 am

KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:

I believe what I said at the OLS was that quicklists are fundamentally crappy
and should be replaced by something that works (Guess that is what you meant
by "plan"?). Quicklists were generalized from the IA64 arch code.

Good fixup but I would think that some more radical rework is needed.

Maybe some of this needs to vanish into the TLB handling logic?

Then I have thought for awhile that the main reason that quicklists exist are
the performance problems in the page allocator. If you can make the single
page alloc / free pass competitive in performance with quicklists then we
could get rid of all uses.





--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Aug 20, 7:05 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., Andrew Morton, (Wed Aug 20, 2:31 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., Robin Holt, (Wed Aug 20, 10:42 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Aug 21, 9:07 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Aug 21, 9:18 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Aug 20, 10:10 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., Robin Holt, (Wed Aug 20, 10:13 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., David Miller, (Wed Aug 20, 11:08 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., Christoph Lameter, (Thu Aug 21, 9:10 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., Robin Holt, (Wed Aug 20, 10:16 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Aug 20, 10:49 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/2] Quicklist is slighly problematic., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Aug 20, 11:26 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/2] quicklist shouldn't be proportional to ..., Christoph Lameter, (Wed Aug 20, 11:27 am)
[RFC][PATCH 1/2] Show quicklist at meminfo, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Wed Aug 20, 7:07 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Show quicklist at meminfo, Andrew Morton, (Wed Aug 20, 2:35 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Show quicklist at meminfo, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Thu Aug 21, 3:36 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Show quicklist at meminfo, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Thu Aug 21, 9:05 pm)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Show quicklist at meminfo, Andrew Morton, (Fri Aug 22, 12:28 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Show quicklist at meminfo, KOSAKI Motohiro, (Sat Aug 23, 4:24 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Show quicklist at meminfo, Andrew Morton, (Sun Aug 24, 1:29 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Show quicklist at meminfo, Robin Holt, (Fri Aug 22, 9:23 am)
Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] Show quicklist at meminfo, Christoph Lameter, (Fri Aug 22, 9:56 am)