On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 03:48:49PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:

quoted text
> well, i didnt suggest you kill that aspect of the patchset - i suggested 

I see, but I agree with Alan that is better to get a first working
inclusion and then working on improments. 8)

quoted text
> you change it to hook into kernel/irq/*.c instead of 
> arch/x86/kernel/irq*.c.
> 
> That way all other architectures will benefit from it, not just x86. 
> Doing an x86-only thing for such features is completely unacceptable.

I see but doing like this I can record IRQs timestamps sooner than in
kernel/irq/*.c, is that right? PPS precision is as better as sooner we
record the timestamps.

Ciao,

Rodolfo

-- 

GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver                          giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems                     phone:  +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming                     skype:  rodolfo.giometti
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/