On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 11:38:57PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
quoted text
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2008 00:49:31 +0200
> Rodolfo Giometti <giometti@enneenne.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 10:53:22PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > > + * void (*dcd_change)(struct uart_port *port, unsigned int status,
> > > > + * 			struct timespec *ts)
> > > > + *
> > > > + *	Tells the discipline that the DCD pin has changed its status and
> > > > + *	the relative timestamp. Pointer ts can be NULL.
> > > >   */
> > > 
> > > uart_port is a specific property of a few random types of interface, pass
> > > a tty struct up. Otherwise looks fine. Might one day expand it to a more
> > > generic change type and pass info on what changed but thats a future
> > > mystery.
> > 
> > How can I get the struct uart_port pointer starting from struct
> > tty_struct one?
> 
> A tty may not even have a uart structure. Why do you need to know the
> interrupt (if such a concept even exists for the given tty) ?

If you look at patch 9
(0009-PPS-low-level-IRQ-timestamps-recording.patch) you can see that
we add a (dirty?) trick to improve PPS precision a lot: we record all
IRQ timestamps into static array and then we return those values
instead of ones passed by dcd_change()...

Maybe I can solve the problem defining dcd_change() as follow:

   void (*dcd_change)(struct tty_struct *tty, unsigned int status,
                        void *data)

and then passing the timestamp or struct uart_port pointer?

Thanks,

Rodolfo

-- 

GNU/Linux Solutions                  e-mail: giometti@enneenne.com
Linux Device Driver                          giometti@linux.it
Embedded Systems                     phone:  +39 349 2432127
UNIX programming                     skype:  rodolfo.giometti
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/