On 8/12/08, Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com> wrote:
quoted text
> On a PowerPC board with ds1374 RTC I'm getting this error while
>  RTC tries to probe:
>
>  rtc-ds1374 0-0068: unable to request IRQ
>
>  This happens because I2C probing code (drivers/of/of_i2c.c) is
>  specifying IRQ0 for 'no irq' case, which is correct.

Shouldn't this be

quoted text
>  -       if (client->irq <= NO_IRQ)

instead of

quoted text
>  -       if (client->irq < 0)
>  +       if (client->irq <= 0)

Since NO_IRQ can vary by platform (0 or -1)? Work is underway to get
everyone onto NO_IRQ=0 but I don't know if it is finished yet. It is
much cleaner to use the NO_IRQ define.

In of_i2c.c shouldn't there be an error check?

		info.irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);

if (info.irq < NO_IRQ) {report error; continue }


quoted text
>
>  The driver handles this incorrectly, though. This patch fixes it.
>
>  Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@ru.mvista.com>
>  ---
>   drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.c |   10 +++++-----
>   1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
>  diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.c
>  index 640acd2..a150418 100644
>  --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.c
>  +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-ds1374.c
>  @@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ static int ds1374_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
>         int cr, sr;
>         int ret = 0;
>
>  -       if (client->irq < 0)
>  +       if (client->irq <= 0)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         mutex_lock(&ds1374->mutex);
>  @@ -212,7 +212,7 @@ static int ds1374_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
>         int cr;
>         int ret = 0;
>
>  -       if (client->irq < 0)
>  +       if (client->irq <= 0)
>                 return -EINVAL;
>
>         ret = ds1374_read_time(dev, &now);
>  @@ -381,7 +381,7 @@ static int ds1374_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>         if (ret)
>                 goto out_free;
>
>  -       if (client->irq >= 0) {
>  +       if (client->irq > 0) {
>                 ret = request_irq(client->irq, ds1374_irq, 0,
>                                   "ds1374", client);
>                 if (ret) {
>  @@ -401,7 +401,7 @@ static int ds1374_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>         return 0;
>
>   out_irq:
>  -       if (client->irq >= 0)
>  +       if (client->irq > 0)
>                 free_irq(client->irq, client);
>
>   out_free:
>  @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ static int __devexit ds1374_remove(struct i2c_client *client)
>   {
>         struct ds1374 *ds1374 = i2c_get_clientdata(client);
>
>  -       if (client->irq >= 0) {
>  +       if (client->irq > 0) {
>                 mutex_lock(&ds1374->mutex);
>                 ds1374->exiting = 1;
>                 mutex_unlock(&ds1374->mutex);
>
> --
>  1.5.6.3
>
>  _______________________________________________
>  Linuxppc-dev mailing list
>  Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
>  https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
>


-- 
Jon Smirl
jonsmirl@gmail.com
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/