Re: [Fwd: Corrections please ...]

Previous thread: none

Next thread: "make prepare" in 2.6.26.2 not behaving? by Stuart Sheldon on Monday, August 18, 2008 - 8:41 pm. (3 messages)
From: Kevin Diggs
Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 - 6:53 pm

Could someone ... anyone take a look at these kernel doc additions?

Thanks!

kevin
From: Dave Chinner
Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 - 7:41 pm

complete() will only wake one waiting thread. If there are multiple
waiters, then further calls to complete() are required to wake them,

Doesn't read very well.

"This waits for either a completion of a specific task to be signalled


Killable means that a kill signal will interrupt the wait, but not
all signals will. Typically used in places where you want a user
ctrl-c or a kill command to succeed but don't want any other signal
to interrupt the completion.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@fromorbit.com
--

From: Kevin Diggs
Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 1:07 am

Take 2 ...

Files attached this time ...

kevin
From: Stefan Richter
Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 5:03 am

Alas several MUAs don't quote attachments in replies.  Hence the optimum
would be if you use a MUA which allows to insert text files without
whitespace change.

Also, when you respond on LKML, always use "reply to all" to keep
previous responders in a thread Cc'd.  This is necessary due to the high

.done and .wait are not public AFAIU and should therefore not be

The last sentence is redundant and should be omitted.
-- 
Stefan Richter
-=====-==--- =--- =--==
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--

From: Marcin Slusarz
Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 9:15 am

You might want to read Documentation/SubmittingPatches.
(Especially points 2, 7, 11 and 12)

Marcin
--

Previous thread: none

Next thread: "make prepare" in 2.6.26.2 not behaving? by Stuart Sheldon on Monday, August 18, 2008 - 8:41 pm. (3 messages)