Re: [2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 8:05 am

On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 04:47:18PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
               ^^^^^^^^
m68knommu

Hopefully someone fixes it instead of just acking this patch.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Aug 19, 6:47 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Tue Aug 19, 7:13 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN, Adrian Bunk, (Tue Aug 19, 7:32 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Aug 19, 8:05 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68knommu: let PCI depend on BROKEN, Greg Ungerer, (Sun Aug 24, 11:16 pm)
Re: [RFC: 2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the broken COMEMPCI ..., Geert Uytterhoeven, (Fri Aug 29, 12:31 am)
[2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Aug 31, 9:10 am)
[2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the eLIA support, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Aug 31, 9:10 am)
[2.6 patch] m68knommu: remove the unused PCI option, Adrian Bunk, (Sun Aug 31, 9:10 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Wed Sep 3, 12:22 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Sat Sep 6, 5:23 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Jesse Barnes, (Mon Sep 8, 10:06 pm)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Geert Uytterhoeven, (Tue Sep 9, 12:11 am)
Re: [2.6 patch] m68k: remove the dead PCI code, Adrian Bunk, (Thu Sep 25, 6:31 am)