Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- connection between HPET and lockups found

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Tuesday, August 19, 2008 - 6:08 am

* David Witbrodt <dawitbro@sbcglobal.net> wrote:


btw., you might also want to look into drivers/char/hpet.c and 
instrument that a bit. In particular the ioremap()s done there will show 
exactly how the hpet is mapped.

In particular this bit:

                if (hpet_is_known(hdp)) {
                        printk(KERN_DEBUG "%s: 0x%lx is busy\n",
                                __func__, hdp->hd_phys_address);
                        iounmap(hdp->hd_address);
                        return AE_ALREADY_EXISTS;
                }


suggests that you've got multiple hpets listed by the BIOS?


that's OK - you've still got a regression.


Whether the system has a hpet listed in the BIOS data structures can be 
seen in acpidump [in the pmtools package]

Even if the BIOS does not list it, the system might have hpet in the 
chipset - hpet=force can be tried to force-enable it.

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: HPET regression in 2.6.26 versus 2.6.25 -- connection ..., Ingo Molnar, (Tue Aug 19, 6:08 am)