Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andrew Morton
Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 - 2:29 pm

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008 23:15:59 +0200
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:


The CPU hotplug maintainer is basically "everyone", because many
subsystems need to interact correctly with hotplugging, and many
subsystems can break it.

This one looks like a clocksource/apic/resume problem?  Probably the
next port of call would be Thomas, with Robert looking on.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
oprofile + hibernation = badness, Vegard Nossum, (Mon Aug 18, 1:32 pm)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Aug 18, 1:51 pm)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Vegard Nossum, (Mon Aug 18, 2:08 pm)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Rafael J. Wysocki, (Mon Aug 18, 2:15 pm)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Andrew Morton, (Mon Aug 18, 2:29 pm)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Andi Kleen, (Mon Aug 18, 6:13 pm)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Vegard Nossum, (Tue Aug 19, 12:12 am)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Aug 19, 2:49 am)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Andi Kleen, (Tue Aug 19, 5:12 am)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Robert Richter, (Tue Aug 19, 5:37 am)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Johannes Weiner, (Tue Aug 19, 5:56 am)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Andi Kleen, (Tue Aug 19, 6:18 am)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Aug 19, 6:18 am)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Robert Richter, (Mon Sep 1, 9:34 am)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Sep 5, 10:58 am)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Robert Richter, (Fri Sep 5, 11:59 am)
Re: oprofile + hibernation = badness, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Sep 5, 1:31 pm)