Re: [PATCH] ata: Add support for Long Logical Sectors and Long Physical Sectors

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Matthew Wilcox
Date: Monday, August 18, 2008 - 11:42 am

On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 07:06:29PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:

;-)  How about two 256-bit arrays?

The first is set for "Use device sector size", the second is set for
"Yes, we know about this command, don't warn".  The most common commands
(reads and writes) will hit the first test and never try the second test.


Why do we need to do that?  Leaving sector_size_supported() unset means
exactly "no to anything but 512".  I'll be quite surprised if we see
PATA drives supporting 4096 or 520 byte sectors anyway.  It seems like
a premium feature.

-- 
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours.  We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
LibATA support for long sectors, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Aug 5, 10:26 am)
[PATCH] ata: Define new commands from ATA8, Matthew Wilcox, (Tue Aug 5, 10:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] ata: Define new commands from ATA8, Greg Freemyer, (Tue Aug 5, 1:10 pm)
Re: [PATCH] ata: Add support for Long Logical Sectors and ..., Matthew Wilcox, (Mon Aug 18, 11:42 am)