On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Peter Dolding wrote:but what you are missing is that when they are mounted under linux it doesn't matter what hidden things the other OS may access, all that matters is what Linux sees. If Linux doesn't see something it can't serve it out to those other OSs. those 'hidden things' would only matter if you were trying to use linux to scan a drive and bless it for another system to then mount locally. If we aren't trying to defend against that (and I don't hear anyone other then you saying we should) then we don't need to worry about such things. If we were trying to make the drive safe for all other OSs to mount directly, then mearly seeing everything isn't enough, you would have to be able to fully duplicate how the other OS interprets the things you are seeing, and know all vunerabilities that arise from all possible interpretations. I don't think that's possible (and I don't think it would be possible even if the source for all those other OSs were available) David Lang --
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Gabriel C | Re: [Announce] [patch] Modular Scheduler Core and Completely Fair Scheduler [CFS] |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 03/37] dccp: List management for new feature negotiation |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Thomas Jarosch | Re: TCP connection stalls under 2.6.24.7 |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
