Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to alinuxinterfaceforon access scanning

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Peter Dolding <oiaohm@...>
Cc: <davecb@...>, <rmeijer@...>, Alan Cox <alan@...>, <capibara@...>, Eric Paris <eparis@...>, Theodore Tso <tytso@...>, Rik van Riel <riel@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, Mihai Don??u <mdontu@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <malware-list@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Date: Sunday, August 17, 2008 - 9:44 pm

On Mon, 18 Aug 2008, Peter Dolding wrote:


but what you are missing is that when they are mounted under linux it 
doesn't matter what hidden things the other OS may access, all that 
matters is what Linux sees. If Linux doesn't see something it can't serve 
it out to those other OSs.

those 'hidden things' would only matter if you were trying to use linux 
to scan a drive and bless it for another system to then mount locally. If 
we aren't trying to defend against that (and I don't hear anyone other 
then you saying we should) then we don't need to worry about such things.

If we were trying to make the drive safe for all other OSs to mount 
directly, then mearly seeing everything isn't enough, you would have to be 
able to fully duplicate how the other OS interprets the things you are 
seeing, and know all vunerabilities that arise from all possible 
interpretations. I don't think that's possible (and I don't think it would 
be possible even if the source for all those other OSs were available)

David Lang
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to alinuxinterfac..., David Collier-Brown, (Sun Aug 17, 5:17 pm)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to alinuxinterfac..., , (Sun Aug 17, 9:44 pm)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to alinuxinterfac..., Arjan van de Ven, (Sat Aug 16, 12:09 am)