Re: [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5 (updated benchmarks)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>
Cc: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Joe Perches <joe@...>, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, August 17, 2008 - 5:30 pm

Here are some updated benchmarks of the rwlock v5, showing [min,avg,max]
delays in non-contended and contended cases :

The test module is available at :

http://ltt.polymtl.ca/svn/trunk/tests/kernel/test-fair-rwlock.c

** Performance tests

Dual quad-core Xeon 2.0GHz E5405

* Lock contention delays, per context, 60s test

** get_cycles calibration **
get_cycles takes [min,avg,max] 78,79,84 cycles, results calibrated on avg

** Single writer test, no contention **
writer_thread/0 iterations : 964054, lock delay [min,avg,max] 149,157,5933 cycles

** Single reader test, no contention **
reader_thread/0 iterations : 37591763, lock delay [min,avg,max] 59,65,21383 cycles

** Multiple readers test, no contention **
reader_thread/0 iterations : 9062919, lock delay [min,avg,max] 59,921,42593 cycles
reader_thread/1 iterations : 9014846, lock delay [min,avg,max] 59,928,42065 cycles
reader_thread/2 iterations : 9394114, lock delay [min,avg,max] 59,897,46877 cycles
reader_thread/3 iterations : 9459081, lock delay [min,avg,max] 59,896,38207 cycles

** High contention test **
4 thread readers (no delay loop)
2 thread trylock readers (no delay loop)
2 thread writers (10us period)
2 thread trylock writers (10us period)
1 periodical interrupt readers on 7/8 cpus (IPIs).
1 periodical interrupt trylock readers on 7/8 cpus (IPIs).

writer_thread/0 iterations : 2864146, lock delay [min,avg,max] 179,9493,102563 cycles
writer_thread/1 iterations : 2986492, lock delay [min,avg,max] 179,9332,66923 cycles
trylock_writer_thread/0 iterations : 12789892, successful iterations : 3257203
trylock_writer_thread/1 iterations : 12747023, successful iterations : 3268997
reader_thread/0 iterations : 13091562, lock delay [min,avg,max] 59,5806,141053 cycles
reader_thread/1 iterations : 12574027, lock delay [min,avg,max] 59,5706,141839 cycles
reader_thread/2 iterations : 12805706, lock delay [min,avg,max] 59,5738,138725 cycles
reader_thread/3 iterations : 13352731, lock delay [min,avg,max] 59,5606,137585 cycles
trylock_reader_thread/0 iterations : 63135422, successful iterations : 15204229
trylock_reader_thread/1 iterations : 62306024, successful iterations : 15123824
interrupt_reader_thread/0 iterations : 559
interrupt readers on CPU 0, lock delay [min,avg,max] 167,984,16271 cycles
interrupt readers on CPU 1, lock delay [min,avg,max] 179,1185,9125 cycles
interrupt readers on CPU 2, lock delay [min,avg,max] 155,940,8081 cycles
interrupt readers on CPU 3, lock delay [min,avg,max] 83,1158,13355 cycles
interrupt readers on CPU 4, lock delay [min,avg,max] 77,863,6371 cycles
interrupt readers on CPU 5, lock delay [min,avg,max] 173,1169,16331 cycles
interrupt readers on CPU 6, lock delay [min,avg,max] 155,834,8705 cycles
interrupt readers on CPU 7, lock delay [min,avg,max] 173,1159,10115 cycles
trylock_interrupt_reader_thread/0 iterations : 570
trylock interrupt readers on CPU 0, iterations 280, successful iterations : 239
trylock interrupt readers on CPU 1, iterations 590, successful iterations : 538
trylock interrupt readers on CPU 2, iterations 431, successful iterations : 372
trylock interrupt readers on CPU 3, iterations 605, successful iterations : 570
trylock interrupt readers on CPU 4, iterations 659, successful iterations : 570
trylock interrupt readers on CPU 5, iterations 616, successful iterations : 570
trylock interrupt readers on CPU 6, iterations 675, successful iterations : 570
trylock interrupt readers on CPU 7, iterations 597, successful iterations : 561

Mathieu

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86_64 : support atomic ops with 64 bits integer val..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sat Aug 16, 3:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86_64 : support atomic ops with 64 bits integer..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sat Aug 16, 11:43 am)
[RFC PATCH] Fair rwlock, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sat Aug 16, 5:19 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Fair rwlock, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 16, 5:33 pm)
[RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v3, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sun Aug 17, 3:53 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v3, Linus Torvalds, (Sun Aug 17, 12:17 pm)
[RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sun Aug 17, 3:10 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5, Peter Zijlstra, (Mon Aug 25, 3:20 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5, Paul E. McKenney, (Mon Aug 18, 7:25 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Aug 19, 2:04 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Aug 19, 3:33 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5, Linus Torvalds, (Tue Aug 19, 12:48 pm)
[RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Thu Aug 21, 4:50 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 21, 5:00 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8, H. Peter Anvin, (Thu Aug 21, 5:26 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 21, 5:41 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 21, 5:15 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sat Aug 23, 1:09 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 23, 2:02 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sat Aug 23, 4:30 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8, Linus Torvalds, (Sat Aug 23, 5:40 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Writer-biased low-latency rwlock v8, Linus Torvalds, (Thu Aug 21, 6:22 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Aug 19, 5:06 am)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5, Linus Torvalds, (Mon Aug 18, 2:59 pm)
Re: [RFC PATCH] Fair low-latency rwlock v5 (updated benchmar..., Mathieu Desnoyers, (Sun Aug 17, 5:30 pm)