On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 07:20:54PM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
quoted text
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 6:02 PM, John W. Linville
> <linville@tuxdriver.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 10:04:12AM +0300, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> >
> >> There is gap in current rfkill implementation that we didn't close
> >> yet.  There were also few patches that were not signed by Intel and
> >> are apparently wrong.
> >
> > Can you be more specific?  Do you know which patches are wrong (even
> > if you don't know how to fix them)?
> >
> 
> 80fcc9e28cf3a209fbfb39a7bbddc313c59c7424
> This one  is wrong and there are more then are not acked even though
> they cause no problem. In general I would prefer that patches will be
> acked by Yi or me.

And in general, they are.  In general I would prefer if you would
work upstream instead of working in iwlwifi-2.6 and periodically
dumping a dozen or more patches on me all at once.  C'est la vie...

quoted text
> I will try to rebase our rfkill fixes ASAP from iwlwifi-2.6. iwl5000 branch.

Thanks!

John
-- 
John W. Linville
linville@tuxdriver.com
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/