patch uml-track-and-make-up-lost-ticks.patch added to 2.6.25-stable tree

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: gregkh
Date: Saturday, August 16, 2008 - 3:32 pm

This is a note to let you know that we have just queued up the patch titled

    Subject: uml: track and make up lost ticks

to the 2.6.25-stable tree.  Its filename is

    uml-track-and-make-up-lost-ticks.patch

A git repo of this tree can be found at 
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary


From stable-bounces@linux.kernel.org Tue Aug  5 13:14:23 2008
From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 16:14:05 -0400
Subject: uml: track and make up lost ticks
To: stable@kernel.org
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, uml-devel <user-mode-linux-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>
Message-ID: <20080805201405.GA11784@c2.user-mode-linux.org>
Content-Disposition: inline

From: Jeff Dike <jdike@addtoit.com>

commit fe2cc53ee013a4d4d0317d418e7019fe6533a5a8 upstream

Alarm delivery could be noticably late in the !CONFIG_NOHZ case because lost
ticks weren't being taken into account.  This is now treated more carefully,
with the time between ticks being calculated and the appropriate number of
ticks delivered to the timekeeping system.

Cc: Nix <nix@esperi.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Dike <jdike@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@suse.de>

---
 arch/um/include/process.h |    4 +--
 arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c |    1 
 arch/um/os-Linux/time.c   |   54 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/um/include/process.h
+++ b/arch/um/include/process.h
@@ -8,8 +8,8 @@
 
 #include <signal.h>
 
-extern void sig_handler(int sig, struct sigcontext sc);
-extern void alarm_handler(int sig, struct sigcontext sc);
+extern void sig_handler(int sig, struct sigcontext *sc);
+extern void alarm_handler(int sig, struct sigcontext *sc);
 
 #endif
 
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/signal.c
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
 #include "as-layout.h"
 #include "kern_util.h"
 #include "os.h"
+#include "process.h"
 #include "sysdep/barrier.h"
 #include "sysdep/sigcontext.h"
 #include "user.h"
--- a/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c
+++ b/arch/um/os-Linux/time.c
@@ -9,7 +9,9 @@
 #include <time.h>
 #include <sys/time.h>
 #include "kern_constants.h"
+#include "kern_util.h"
 #include "os.h"
+#include "process.h"
 #include "user.h"
 
 int set_interval(void)
@@ -58,12 +60,17 @@ static inline long long timeval_to_ns(co
 long long disable_timer(void)
 {
 	struct itimerval time = ((struct itimerval) { { 0, 0 }, { 0, 0 } });
+	int remain, max = UM_NSEC_PER_SEC / UM_HZ;
 
 	if (setitimer(ITIMER_VIRTUAL, &time, &time) < 0)
 		printk(UM_KERN_ERR "disable_timer - setitimer failed, "
 		       "errno = %d\n", errno);
 
-	return timeval_to_ns(&time.it_value);
+	remain = timeval_to_ns(&time.it_value);
+	if (remain > max)
+		remain = max;
+
+	return remain;
 }
 
 long long os_nsecs(void)
@@ -79,7 +86,44 @@ static int after_sleep_interval(struct t
 {
 	return 0;
 }
+
+static void deliver_alarm(void)
+{
+	alarm_handler(SIGVTALRM, NULL);
+}
+
+static unsigned long long sleep_time(unsigned long long nsecs)
+{
+	return nsecs;
+}
+
 #else
+unsigned long long last_tick;
+unsigned long long skew;
+
+static void deliver_alarm(void)
+{
+	unsigned long long this_tick = os_nsecs();
+	int one_tick = UM_NSEC_PER_SEC / UM_HZ;
+
+	if (last_tick == 0)
+		last_tick = this_tick - one_tick;
+
+	skew += this_tick - last_tick;
+
+	while (skew >= one_tick) {
+		alarm_handler(SIGVTALRM, NULL);
+		skew -= one_tick;
+	}
+
+	last_tick = this_tick;
+}
+
+static unsigned long long sleep_time(unsigned long long nsecs)
+{
+	return nsecs > skew ? nsecs - skew : 0;
+}
+
 static inline long long timespec_to_us(const struct timespec *ts)
 {
 	return ((long long) ts->tv_sec * UM_USEC_PER_SEC) +
@@ -102,6 +146,8 @@ static int after_sleep_interval(struct t
 	 */
 	if (start_usecs > usec)
 		start_usecs = usec;
+
+	start_usecs -= skew / UM_NSEC_PER_USEC;
 	tv = ((struct timeval) { .tv_sec  = start_usecs / UM_USEC_PER_SEC,
 				 .tv_usec = start_usecs % UM_USEC_PER_SEC });
 	interval = ((struct itimerval) { { 0, usec }, tv });
@@ -113,8 +159,6 @@ static int after_sleep_interval(struct t
 }
 #endif
 
-extern void alarm_handler(int sig, struct sigcontext *sc);
-
 void idle_sleep(unsigned long long nsecs)
 {
 	struct timespec ts;
@@ -126,10 +170,12 @@ void idle_sleep(unsigned long long nsecs
 	 */
 	if (nsecs == 0)
 		nsecs = UM_NSEC_PER_SEC / UM_HZ;
+
+	nsecs = sleep_time(nsecs);
 	ts = ((struct timespec) { .tv_sec	= nsecs / UM_NSEC_PER_SEC,
 				  .tv_nsec	= nsecs % UM_NSEC_PER_SEC });
 
 	if (nanosleep(&ts, &ts) == 0)
-		alarm_handler(SIGVTALRM, NULL);
+		deliver_alarm();
 	after_sleep_interval(&ts);
 }


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jdike@addtoit.com are

queue-2.6.25/uml-fix-build-when-slob-is-enabled.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-fix-bad-ntp-interaction-with-clock.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-physical-memory-shouldn-t-include-initial-stack.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-track-and-make-up-lost-ticks.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-missed-kmalloc-in-pcap_user.c.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-deal-with-host-time-going-backwards.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-deal-with-inaccessible-address-space-start.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-missing-export-of-csum_partial-on-uml-amd64.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-memcpy-export-needs-to-follow-host-declaration.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-stub-needs-to-tolerate-sigwinch.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-work-around-broken-host-ptrace_sysemu.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-fix-gcc-ices-and-unresolved-externs.patch
queue-2.6.25/uml-fix-boot-crash.patch
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 4/14] uml: track and make up lost ticks, Jeff Dike, (Tue Aug 5, 1:14 pm)
patch uml-track-and-make-up-lost-ticks.patch added to 2.6. ..., gregkh, (Sat Aug 16, 3:32 pm)