From: Michael Ellerman <michael@ellerman.id.au>
Date: Thu, 14 Aug 2008 21:26:53 +1000

quoted text
> Perhaps after the first loop we should set memory_limit to equal
> lmb_end_of_DRAM(), then the second loop should work as it is.

Sounds great.  Mind if I push the following to Linus?

lmb: Fix reserved region handling in lmb_enforce_memory_limit().

The idea of the implementation of this fix is from Michael Ellerman.

This function has two loops, but they each interpret the memory_limit
value differently.  The first loop interprets it as a "size limit"
whereas the second loop interprets it as an "address limit".

Before the second loop runs, reset memory_limit to lmb_end_of_DRAM()
so that it all works out.

Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>

diff --git a/lib/lmb.c b/lib/lmb.c
index 5d7b928..97e5470 100644
--- a/lib/lmb.c
+++ b/lib/lmb.c
@@ -462,6 +462,8 @@ void __init lmb_enforce_memory_limit(u64 memory_limit)
 	if (lmb.memory.region[0].size < lmb.rmo_size)
 		lmb.rmo_size = lmb.memory.region[0].size;
 
+	memory_limit = lmb_end_of_DRAM();
+
 	/* And truncate any reserves above the limit also. */
 	for (i = 0; i < lmb.reserved.cnt; i++) {
 		p = &lmb.reserved.region[i];
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/