On Fri, Aug 15, 2008 at 02:06:47PM -0400, Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu wrote:For a mail server, I really think something specialized like ClamAV is a much better solution than something in userspace, which will probably decide it has to rescan every single file that gets written, including your mail server logs. :-) A specialized solution for a mail server is *always* going to be able to a more efficient, more practical, and be able to do application-specialized things (such as refusing the e-mail while the connection is still open, so you don't have to worry about being RFC compliant about sending bounce mails when the SMTP return-path is most likely bogus). - Ted --
| Martin Michlmayr | Network slowdown due to CFS |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: containers (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
| Ingo Molnar | Re: x86 arch updates also broke s390 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH iproute2 v2] Re: HTB accuracy for high speed |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
