Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Peter Dolding <oiaohm@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-security-module@...>
Date: Friday, August 15, 2008 - 2:50 pm

"Peter Dolding" <oiaohm@gmail.com> wrote on 08/15/2008 06:37:27 AM:


Is fault tolerance a requirement just for the TPM, or is it a general>
Linux requirement?  Has it always been there, or is it new?

For example, does kernel software have to gracefully handle
failures in the disk controller, processor, memory controller, BIOS
flash memory, etc?

I'd think it would be quite hard to code around motherboard
failures in a commodity platform not designed for fault tolerance.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface, Christoph Hellwig, (Sat Aug 9, 2:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface, Christoph Hellwig, (Tue Aug 12, 3:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface, Kenneth Goldman, (Tue Aug 12, 4:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface, Kenneth Goldman, (Mon Aug 18, 11:01 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface, Peter Dolding, (Fri Aug 15, 6:37 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface, Kenneth Goldman, (Fri Aug 15, 2:50 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface, Kenneth Goldman, (Wed Aug 13, 9:58 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface, Kenneth Goldman, (Wed Aug 13, 9:46 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface, Kenneth Goldman, (Wed Aug 13, 12:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/4] integrity: TPM internel kernel interface, Christoph Hellwig, (Wed Aug 13, 10:45 am)