Re: [PATCH] x86: fix /proc/meminfo DirectMap

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <x86@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, August 15, 2008 - 9:32 am

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:

Yes, that's what I meant by the TLB optimizers.  But it's going to
be a fractional effect, isn't it, when you're trying to get the last
1% out of the machine?  And in such a case, you might wonder more
what all the 4k ones are actually being used for (no problem at all
if they've ended up behind vmalloced module text).

Hugh
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: fix /proc/meminfo DirectMap, Hugh Dickins, (Fri Aug 15, 8:58 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix /proc/meminfo DirectMap, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Aug 15, 9:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix /proc/meminfo DirectMap, Hugh Dickins, (Fri Aug 15, 10:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix /proc/meminfo DirectMap, Andi Kleen, (Fri Aug 15, 9:15 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix /proc/meminfo DirectMap, Hugh Dickins, (Fri Aug 15, 9:32 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix /proc/meminfo DirectMap, Ingo Molnar, (Fri Aug 15, 9:45 am)
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix /proc/meminfo DirectMap, Andi Kleen, (Fri Aug 15, 9:36 am)