Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to alinuxinterfaceforon access scanning

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rik van Riel
Date: Thursday, August 14, 2008 - 5:00 pm

On Fri, 15 Aug 2008 00:39:18 +0200
Pavel Machek <pavel@suse.cz> wrote:


If you're trolling, you're not being very good at it.

Just because you cannot easily infect a Linux system from a
user application does not mean malware cannot do all kinds
of damage with user privileges.  Think of a key sniffer (using
the same interface that the X screensavers use) or a spam bot
running with user privileges.

Firefox, OpenOffice.org and other (mostly desktop) programs are 
extremely large and complex, deal with untrusted data on a daily
basis and could be used to spread worms and get malware onto systems.

The old DOS model of "you need to infect system binaries" is not
a good description of how today's malware works.  Malware is not
there to infect a system "as much as possible", but to accomplish
actual malice.

Consequently, the number of acceptable attack vectors on a system
is pretty large and we should protect against these kinds of
programs.

It would be good to get this additional layer of protection against
malware in place, before people start developing Linux malware.

-- 
All rights reversed.
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linux inte ..., David Collier-Brown, (Wed Aug 6, 4:31 am)
Sidebar to [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a lin ..., David Collier-Brown, (Wed Aug 6, 4:40 am)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to a linuxinter ..., David Collier-Brown, (Mon Aug 11, 9:11 am)
Re: [malware-list] [RFC 0/5] [TALPA] Intro to alinuxinterf ..., Rik van Riel, (Thu Aug 14, 5:00 pm)