On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 10:23 PM, Langsdorf, Mark <mark.langsdorf@amd.com> wrote:On the first look the ACPI seems correct. The first two P00x objects have this PSD: Package (0x05) { 0x05, 0x00, 0x00000000, 0x000000FD, 0x00000002 } The other two have 0x00000001 at the third position. But as I don't really have a clue about ACPI, I'm attaching the complete SSDT so you can take look. Just ask, if you need the other tables too. Torsten
| Linus Torvalds | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Mike Galbraith | Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke |
| Con Kolivas | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 24/37] dccp: Processing Confirm options |
| Linus Torvalds | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Woodhouse | Re: [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
