Re: [2.6.27 patch] #error for gcc 4.1.{0,1}

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...>
Date: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 - 5:22 pm

On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 01:57:49PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:

We are talking about runtime breakages, with new breakages added in each 
kernel release.

Which is not nice for users.

And my patch is the result of developers spending time on debugging and 
working around a real-life bug caused by this compiler bug.

If you insist on keeping your 4.1.0 compilers I can prepare a patch that 
removes the fatal __weak usages.


cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[2.6.27 patch] #error for gcc 4.1.{0,1}, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Aug 13, 4:44 pm)
Re: [2.6.27 patch] #error for gcc 4.1.{0,1}, Andrew Morton, (Wed Aug 13, 4:57 pm)
Re: [2.6.27 patch] #error for gcc 4.1.{0,1}, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Aug 13, 5:22 pm)