On Wed, 13 Aug 2008, Andi Kleen wrote:
quoted text
> 
> Also I must say the whole ftrace noping exercise is pretty pointless without
> avoiding frame pointers because it does save less than what you lose
> unconditionally from the "select FRAME_POINTER"

Andi, you seem to have missed the whole point. This is a _correctness_ 
issue as long as the nop is not a single instruction. And the workaround 
for that is uglier than just making a single-instruction nop.

So the question now is to find a good nop that _is_ a single atomic 
instruction. Your blathering about frame pointers is missing the whole 
point!

			Linus
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/