Cc: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, <davecb@...>, Greg KH <greg@...>, Press, Jonathan <Jonathan.Press@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, <malware-list@...>, Mihai Don??u <mdontu@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@infradead.org> wrote on 13/08/2008 14:54:01:
LD_PRELOAD does not solve at least knfsd and suid binaries. But we are
going in circles. :)
Same is true for a kernel solution. Plus, it also works for those who make
system calls directly, knfsd and suid binaries, and we can have cheap and
ultra-efficient caching. Not much kernel code, even less complex kernel
code and unmeasurable impact when not used and compiled in. What are the
big technical objections to that?
--
Tvrtko A. Ursulin
Senior Software Engineer, Sophos
"Views and opinions expressed in this email are strictly those of the
author.
The contents has not been reviewed or approved by Sophos."
Sophos Plc, The Pentagon, Abingdon Science Park, Abingdon,
OX14 3YP, United Kingdom.
Company Reg No 2096520. VAT Reg No GB 348 3873 20.
--