> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 9:18 AM, Adrian Bunk <bunk@kernel.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 02:58:08PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
>>> On Mon 2008-08-04 14:26:21, Tim Tassonis wrote:
>>>>> Why is reiser4 still not in a vanilla kernel for
>>>>> testing. I have had
>>>>> to apply the reiser4 patches from -mm kernels to
>>>>> vanilla based
>>>>> patchset for over a year now. Reiser4 works fine, what
>>>>> will it take to
>>>>> get it included in vanilla? Here is a patch to add
>>>>> reiser4 to
>>>>> 2.6.27-rc1:
>>>>>
>>>>>
http://zen-sources.org/files/reiser4-for-2.6.27-rc1.patch
>>>>>
>>>>> -Ryan
>>>> A good thing for a start would be to rename the whole
>>>> thing to something else, for obvious reasons.
>>> Whats wrong with reiser4 name?
>>>
>>> Pavel
>>> (or am I feeding a troll?)
>> Not wanting a new filesystem named after a convicted murderer is not
>> a trollish suggestion.
>
>
> Regardless of the murder conviction, I still believe that the guy
> should get credit for his work.
>
> Reiserfs is a name that we all know of, regardless of how current we
> are with the news (although you'd have to be PRETTY far behind if you
> don't know about the crime)
>
> The current reiserfs filesystems aren't being renamed -- are they??
>
> Does it really hurt to keep his name there? I think it should just go as-is.
