Michael Krufky wrote:Well, in my opinion, there is little point in renaming reiserfs 3 now, as it is basically obsolete anyway and I suppose will disappear over time. As reiser4 is not yet in and would need some rework before inclusion anyway, the name could be fixed easily and I do think it would be a bit irritating to just completely ignore real-world issues. As for giving credit, I wasn't advocating in removing authorship attribution (that's what giving credit means to me), but calling the filesystem after himself was always a bit egocentric anyway. We don't have t'sofs, engelfs, molnarsched and stuff like that. And yes, I think Hans lost his right to decide over the name because of what he has done. That is no disrespect for his work, only for him as person in general, and I do strongly disrespect him as a person. Tim --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Justin Piszcz | exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 / SErr 0x0 action 0x2 frozen |
| Heiko Carstens | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Frans Pop | svc: failed to register lockdv1 RPC service (errno 97). |
| Radu Rendec | htb parallelism on multi-core platforms |
