On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:31 PM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:
The main thing this fixes is the memrlimit controller, which is only
in -mm. But there's also a dereference of mm->owner in memcontrol.c -
and I think that needs to be fixed to handle a possible NULL mm->owner
too, since in the case of a swapoff racing with the last user of an mm
exiting, I suspect that the swapoff code could try to pull in a page
that gets charged to the mm after its owner has been set to NULL.
Paul
--