[PATCH 1/3][reiser4] use wake_up_process() instead of wake_up() when possible

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ryan Hope
Date: Monday, August 11, 2008 - 3:34 pm

This was item #6 on the todo list for reiser4 inclusion in mainline:

diff --git a/fs/reiser4/entd.c b/fs/reiser4/entd.c
index ecdfde6..9fd4d6e 100644
--- a/fs/reiser4/entd.c
+++ b/fs/reiser4/entd.c
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@ void reiser4_leave_flush(struct super_block *super)
  #endif
  	spin_unlock(&ent->guard);
  	if (wake_up_ent)
-		wake_up(&ent->wait);
+		wake_up_process(ent->tsk);
  }

  #define ENTD_CAPTURE_APAGE_BURST SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX
@@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ int write_page_by_ent(struct page *page, struct 
writeback_control *wbc)
  	ent->nr_todo_reqs++;
  	list_add_tail(&rq.link, &ent->todo_list);
  	if (ent->nr_todo_reqs == 1)
-		wake_up(&ent->wait);
+		wake_up_process(ent->tsk);

  	spin_unlock(&ent->guard);


-Ryan
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 1/3][reiser4] use wake_up_process() instead of wake ..., Ryan Hope, (Mon Aug 11, 3:34 pm)