On Sun, 2008-08-10 at 07:55 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
quoted text > Struct pt_regs is not ABI, and can (and has) changed on x86. It's not
> suitable for a checkpoint structure because it only contains the
> registers that the kernel trashes, not all usermode registers (on i386,
> it leaves out %gs, for example). asm-x86/ptrace-abi.h does define stuff
> that's fixed in stone; it expresses it in terms of a register array,
> with constants defining what element is which register.
Thanks for the explanation.
I just want to reduce the coding and maintenance burden here. Xen must
do this for partition mobility, right? Does it define all its own
stuff?
-- Dave
--
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [RFC][PATCH 2/4] checkpoint/restart: x86 support , Dave Hansen , (Mon Aug 11, 8:36 am)