Re: sh O= builds broken

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Paul Mundt <lethal@...>, Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>, <linux-sh@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Friday, August 1, 2008 - 6:12 pm

On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 06:53:38AM +0900, Paul Mundt wrote:
Ups - I should have caught that when I reviewd your initial patch.
kbuild does on purpose not fiddle with the path in the inital
include specification.

	Sam
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
sh O= builds broken, Adrian Bunk, (Fri Aug 1, 5:27 pm)
Re: sh O= builds broken, Paul Mundt, (Fri Aug 1, 5:53 pm)
Re: sh O= builds broken, Sam Ravnborg, (Fri Aug 1, 6:12 pm)
Re: sh O= builds broken, Adrian Bunk, (Fri Aug 1, 6:03 pm)