[PATCH RT RFC 4/7] RT: wrap the rt_rwlock "add reader" logic

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <mingo@...>, <paulmck@...>, <peterz@...>, <tglx@...>, <rosted@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-rt-users@...>, <gregory.haskins@...>
Date: Friday, August 1, 2008 - 5:17 pm

We will use this later in the series to add PI functions on "add".

Signed-off-by: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@novell.com>
---

 kernel/rtmutex.c |   16 +++++++++++-----
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rtmutex.c b/kernel/rtmutex.c
index 12de859..62fdc3d 100644
--- a/kernel/rtmutex.c
+++ b/kernel/rtmutex.c
@@ -1122,6 +1122,12 @@ static void rw_check_held(struct rw_mutex *rwm)
 # define rw_check_held(rwm)	do { } while (0)
 #endif
 
+static inline void
+rt_rwlock_add_reader(struct reader_lock_struct *rls, struct rw_mutex *rwm)
+{
+	list_add(&rls->list, &rwm->readers);
+}
+
 /*
  * The fast path does not add itself to the reader list to keep
  * from needing to grab the spinlock. We need to add the owner
@@ -1163,7 +1169,7 @@ rt_rwlock_update_owner(struct rw_mutex *rwm, struct task_struct *own)
 	if (rls->list.prev && !list_empty(&rls->list))
 		return;
 
-	list_add(&rls->list, &rwm->readers);
+	rt_rwlock_add_reader(rls, rwm);
 
 	/* change to reader, so no one else updates too */
 	rt_rwlock_set_owner(rwm, RT_RW_READER, RT_RWLOCK_CHECK);
@@ -1197,7 +1203,7 @@ static int try_to_take_rw_read(struct rw_mutex *rwm, int mtx)
 			 * it hasn't been added to the link list yet.
 			 */
 			if (!rls->list.prev || list_empty(&rls->list))
-				list_add(&rls->list, &rwm->readers);
+				rt_rwlock_add_reader(rls, rwm);
 			rt_rwlock_set_owner(rwm, RT_RW_READER, 0);
 			rls->count++;
 			incr = 0;
@@ -1276,7 +1282,7 @@ static int try_to_take_rw_read(struct rw_mutex *rwm, int mtx)
 			rls->lock = rwm;
 			rls->count = 1;
 			WARN_ON(rls->list.prev && !list_empty(&rls->list));
-			list_add(&rls->list, &rwm->readers);
+			rt_rwlock_add_reader(rls, rwm);
 		} else
 			WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
 		spin_unlock(&current->pi_lock);
@@ -1473,7 +1479,7 @@ __rt_read_fasttrylock(struct rw_mutex *rwm)
 			spin_lock(&mutex->wait_lock);
 			rls = &current->owned_read_locks[reader_count];
 			if (!rls->list.prev || list_empty(&rls->list))
-				list_add(&rls->list, &rwm->readers);
+				rt_rwlock_add_reader(rlw, rwm);
 			spin_unlock(&mutex->wait_lock);
 		} else
 			spin_unlock(&current->pi_lock);
@@ -2083,7 +2089,7 @@ rt_mutex_downgrade_write(struct rw_mutex *rwm)
 
 	/* Set us up for multiple readers or conflicts */
 
-	list_add(&rls->list, &rwm->readers);
+	rt_rwlock_add_reader(rls, rwm);
 	rwm->owner = RT_RW_READER;
 
 	/*

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH RT RFC 0/7] Priority Inheritance enhancements, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Aug 1, 5:16 pm)
[PATCH RT RFC v4 0/8] Priority Inheritance enhancements, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Aug 15, 4:28 pm)
[PATCH RT RFC v2 0/8] Priority Inheritance enhancements, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Aug 15, 8:08 am)
[PATCH RT RFC 5/7] rtmutex: use runtime init for rtmutexes, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Aug 1, 5:17 pm)
[PATCH RT RFC 4/7] RT: wrap the rt_rwlock "add reader" logic, Gregory Haskins, (Fri Aug 1, 5:17 pm)