On Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 12:34:53PM -0400, Ryan Hope wrote:Well, if you're going to work on reiser4 (and I think there were other people who had also expressed interest/plans to work on it; you might try doing a search on the various mailing lists so you can coordinate with them and avoid duplicating work), my suggestion to you would be to find the comments that were made by the reviewers way back when, and make sure those comments have been addressed. Then, re-requests a code review, and promise that you won't abuse, and insult the integrity and impugn the motivations of the reviewers like Hans did, and hopefully after they review the code, fix those problems as well. Then you can try resubmitting for inclusion. Best regards, - Ted --
| H. Peter Anvin | Re: [RFC 00/15] x86_64: Optimize percpu accesses |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 008/196] Chinese: add translation of volatile-considered-harmful.txt |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Alex Chiang | [PATCH 1/4] Remove path attribute from sgi_hotplug |
git: | |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Eric Dumazet | Re: [PATCH 3/3] Convert the UDP hash lock to RCU |
