Re: [PATCH 0/3] Genclk: generic framework for clocks managing [v3.1]

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Dmitry Baryshkov <dbaryshkov@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <akpm@...>, Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...>, Russell King <rmk+lkml@...>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...>, pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, <tony@...>, <paul@...>, David Brownell <david-b@...>, Mark Brown <broonie@...>, ian <spyro@...>
Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008 - 10:07 am

On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:42:42PM +0400, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:

Any particular reason why you've not changed the enable and disable
methods to one single method taking a bool?
 

-- 
Ben (ben@fluff.org, http://www.fluff.org/)

  'a smiley only costs 4 bytes'
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/3] Genclk: generic framework for clocks managin..., Ben Dooks, (Tue Jul 8, 10:07 am)
[PATCH 3/3] Clocklib: refactor SA-1100 to use clocklib, Dmitry Baryshkov, (Tue Jul 8, 9:44 am)
[PATCH 2/3] Refactor arm/pxa to use generic clocks support, Dmitry Baryshkov, (Tue Jul 8, 9:43 am)