Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10)

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <linux-raid@...>, <linux-ide@...>
Date: Tuesday, July 8, 2008 - 2:59 am

Hello!

BTW:
The error in syslog also accoured when Reallocated_Sector_Ct didn't go up.

Ciao,
Gerhard

--
http://www.wiesinger.com/


On Tue, 8 Jul 2008, Gerhard Wiesinger wrote:

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Justin Piszcz, (Sat Jul 5, 12:57 pm)
Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Gerhard Wiesinger, (Mon Jul 7, 11:04 am)
Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Gerhard Wiesinger, (Mon Jul 7, 11:08 am)
Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Gerhard Wiesinger, (Tue Jul 8, 2:24 am)
Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Gerhard Wiesinger, (Tue Jul 8, 6:33 am)
Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Gerhard Wiesinger, (Wed Jul 9, 1:37 am)
Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Gerhard Wiesinger, (Sat Jul 12, 4:29 am)
Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Henrique de Moraes Holschuh..., (Wed Jul 9, 9:27 pm)
Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Gerhard Wiesinger, (Tue Jul 8, 2:59 am)
Re: Lots of con-current I/O = resets SATA link? (2.6.25.10), Gerhard Wiesinger, (Tue Jul 8, 6:31 am)