Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 2008-07-03 at 19:19 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> > Why not just use ELF_HWCAP for this?  It looks like powerpc only has 3 bits
> > left there (keeping it to 32), but 3 is not 0.  If not that, why not use
> > dsocaps?  That is, some magic in the vDSO, which glibc already supports on
> > all machines where it uses the vDSO.  (For how it works, see the use in
> > arch/x86/vdso/vdso32/note.S for CONFIG_XEN.)
> 
> Well, we use strings to represent the platforms already (ie, the actual
> CPU microarchitecture). Fitting those into bits would be annoying, it
> makes sense to have AT_BASE_PLATFORM to be the "base" variant of
> AT_PLATFORM.
> 
> _However_ there is a bug in that this patch adds an entry without
> bumping the number of entries in the cached array (ie.
> AT_VECTOR_SIZE_BASE needs to be updated).

Ugh, yes.  I was hoping to work this in such a way that AT_VECTOR_SIZE
(and thus the size of mm_struct) increases only for architectures that
implement AT_BASE_PLATFORM... would it be wrong to account for it in
AT_VECTOR_SIZE_ARCH?
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/