Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...>, Len Brown <lenb@...>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...>, <linux-next@...>, <linux-acpi@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Andi Kleen <andi@...>
Yes. The whole commit should be reverted as mentioned in the other
e-mail (it didn't even bear my sign-off mark). This would include the
line you are referring to as well. I have submitted a patch to add a
64-bit variation of replace_pin_at_irq() separately.
Maciej
--