Krzysztof Halasa wrote:If I get such patches and can apply them without /very/ much work, I gladly take them of course too. But these are not the people anyway to which this maintainers lookup service would be targeted to. As I see it, the people who want such a service are those who frequently send patches for various different areas of the kernel. And these people don't work with 2.6.12. (OTOH, occasional posters who don't even check if their patch would apply to a newer kernel too before they post it will probably also have less interest in figuring out the 100% optimum To: and Cc: list for their submission. A "tell me a list of mail addresses; whatever you give me, I am not really interested in the particulars" service would not be an appropriate tool for these people.) Not at all. These are the forums where patches can be discussed in more detail because knowledgeable people are subscribed there. You also have archives which you can query for patch postings and their discussions. What you don't get is of course a unified "look and feel". Some list archives are crap, some lists are subscriber-only, some kernel areas are not covered by a special list. But the latter problem won't really go away with the proposed maintainers lookup service. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==--- -=== --=== http://arcgraph.de/sr/ --
| Davide Libenzi | [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2 |
| Benjamin Herrenschmidt | Re: [PATCH] Remove process freezer from suspend to RAM pathway |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 011/196] sysfs: Fix a copy-n-paste typo in comment |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Jarek Poplawski | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| Rémi Denis-Courmont | [PATCH] USB host CDC Phonet network interface driver |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
git: | |
