Alan Cox wrote:
quoted text
> On Mon, 07 Jul 2008 14:57:56 -0400
> Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org> wrote:
> 
>> Alan Cox wrote:
>>>> When the firmware travels with the module, as it does today in tg3, bnx2 
>>>> and others, is the most reliable system available.  The simplest, the 
>>>> least amount of "parts", the easiest to upgrade, the best method to 
>>>> guarantee driver/firmware version matches.  It works wonderfully today.
>>>>
>>>> Is it difficult to see why someone might want to keep the same attributes?
>>> No I can see that, should be a simple matter of sending David patches.
>> Isn't it David's obligation not to remove a highly reliable, working system?
> 
> I don't see why it should be David's job to add every conceivable feature
> to the code. 

Just whose job is it, exactly, to avoid regressions?

Why is it unfair to ask a patch author not to break stuff?


quoted text
> And this is the pot calling the kettle black. You badly
> broke Marvell PATA support by setting the Marvell SATA devices to AHCI. I
> note you've still not fixed that after some months.

Even if we accept that at face value, which I don't (it's more a driver 
load order issue), that is no excuse for further regressions.

	Jeff


--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/