Re: Oops/Warning report of the week of July 4th 2008

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>, NetDev <netdev@...>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...>, <linville@...>
Date: Friday, July 4, 2008 - 6:23 pm

On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 03:14:46PM -0700, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
 
 > The stats look very similar to last week; Fedora released a 2.6.25.9 based
 > kernel upgrade, which led to a new sighting (at rank 12): the rt25xx wireless
 > driver is calling flush_workqueue() with a NULL parameter in some cases.
 > There has been a lot of thrash about the last report with regard to inclusion of wireless.git
 > into the Fedora kernel rpms. As an observer I can say that it's both a blessing and a bog.
 > It's a blessing in that this allows bugs to show up early before wireless.git hits mainline
 > (as an example: this is the third or fourth fedora rpm upgrade in a row that showed new and exciting
 > oopses/warnings due to rt25xx... as a result of very active development). It's a bog in that
 > it may expose users to not-quite-ready code. So far it seems the Fedora kernel maintainers are happy
 > enough with the overall balance that they continue the practice.

I actually think we need to scale things back a notch wrt pushing
wireless.git bits to users of released distros.  The recent disaster
in wireless caused a shitstorm in bugzilla that we never even saw
in rawhide.  A clear sign that we're pushing things too fast to users.

It's great that we're getting this stuff tested, but at the same time,
it doesn't give a great impression, and makes users reluctant to always
apply the latest updates if the last time around they have to deal with
this kind of fallout.

	Dave

-- 
http://www.codemonkey.org.uk
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Oops/Warning report of the week of July 4th 2008, Arjan van de Ven, (Fri Jul 4, 6:14 pm)
Re: Oops/Warning report of the week of July 4th 2008, Ingo Molnar, (Sat Jul 5, 2:39 am)
Re: Oops/Warning report of the week of July 4th 2008, Dave Jones, (Fri Jul 4, 6:23 pm)
Re: Oops/Warning report of the week of July 4th 2008, John W. Linville, (Mon Jul 7, 11:55 am)