On Fri, 2008-07-04 at 13:52 -0700, David Miller wrote:
quoted text
> From: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
> Date: Fri, 04 Jul 2008 21:43:38 +0100
> 
> > He must do. After all, I was working for Red Hat when I started on
> > cleaning up these drivers.
> 
> Then I hope you've caught the e100 ucode in your changes, for
> the sake of full transparency :-)

Yes, I have. I sincerely hope that patch was posted for review;
certainly it _should_ have been. If not, I apologise. It's in
linux-next.

But as I said, I've stopped working on drivers/net/ for now; we're
concentrating on the rest of the kernel where the maintainers are
_happy_ to be brought up to date.

The intention was always that this set of patches should be obviously
correct and uncontentious, without inflaming the religious nutters on
_either_ side of the debate. The fact that there that the most vocal of
the fanatics on _both_ sides are flaming about the sensible middle
ground, where I'm just consolidating what has been common practice for
ages _anyway_, is rather bemusing to me...

-- 
dwmw2

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/