Re: [PATCH 1/3] Clocklib: add generic framework for managing clocks.

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <akpm@...>, Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...>, Russell King <rmk+lkml@...>, Paul Mundt <lethal@...>, pHilipp Zabel <philipp.zabel@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, <tony@...>, <paul@...>, David Brownell <david-b@...>, Mark Brown <broonie@...>, ian <spyro@...>
Date: Friday, July 4, 2008 - 5:04 am

On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 09:31:57PM +0100, Ben Dooks wrote:

Because there will be probably no "clock only" drivers. Probably it
should go into kernel/, but definitely not into drivers/clk/


It was discussed before. Andrew Morton specifically said, that he
doesn't want set_enable-like functions with bool param.


It is allocated dynamically by drivers. I can move this to
struct clk_private to specify that it's private, but it should be
visible outside


it was modelled after CONFIG_HAVE_GPIO_LIB


fine


ok


-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 3/3] Clocklib: refactor SA-1100 to use clocklib, Dmitry Baryshkov, (Thu Jun 26, 8:52 am)
[PATCH 2/3] Clocklib: Refactor PXA arm arch to use clocklib., Dmitry Baryshkov, (Thu Jun 26, 8:51 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Clocklib: add generic framework for managing..., Dmitry Baryshkov, (Fri Jul 4, 5:04 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Clocklib: add generic framework for managing..., Haavard Skinnemoen, (Fri Jul 4, 5:12 am)
Re: [PATCH 1/3] Clocklib: add generic framework for managing..., Dmitry Baryshkov, (Thu Jun 26, 11:03 am)