login
Login
/
Register
Search
Search this site:
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2008
»
July
»
31
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flush IPI vector?
view
thread
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From: Ingo Molnar
Subject:
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flush IPI vector?
Date: Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 1:57 pm
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:
quoted text
> Peter Zijlstra wrote: > > How about using just arch_send_call_function_single_ipi() to implement > > smp_send_reschedule() ? > > > > The overhead of that is a smp_mb() and a list_empty() check in > > generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt() if there is indeed no work > > to do. > > Is doing a no-op interrupt sufficient on all architectures? Is there > some change a function call IPI might not go through the normal > reschedule interrupt exit path?
We'd still use the smp_send_reschdule(cpu) API, so it's an architecture detail. On x86 we'd use arch_send_call_function_single_ipi(). Ingo --
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flush IP ...
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Mon Jul 28, 4:16 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Mon Jul 28, 4:20 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Mon Jul 28, 4:34 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Mon Jul 28, 7:12 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Nick Piggin
, (Mon Jul 28, 9:30 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Mon Jul 28, 11:19 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Mon Jul 28, 11:29 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Jul 29, 2:47 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Tue Jul 29, 2:54 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Jul 29, 3:00 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Tue Jul 29, 3:04 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Nick Piggin
, (Tue Jul 29, 3:17 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Tue Jul 29, 3:23 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Tue Jul 29, 3:45 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Jul 29, 5:02 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Tue Jul 29, 7:46 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Andi Kleen
, (Tue Jul 29, 7:58 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Thu Jul 31, 9:48 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Jeremy Fitzhardinge
, (Thu Jul 31, 10:48 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Ingo Molnar
, (Thu Jul 31, 1:57 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Peter Zijlstra
, (Thu Jul 31, 2:15 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ...
, Nick Piggin
, (Thu Jul 31, 6:32 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
David Howells
[PATCH] KEYS: Use the variable 'key' in keyctl_describe_key()
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 17/36] sysdev: detect multiple driver registrations
Andy Walls
Re: [PATCH 11/32] v4l/cx18: update workqueue usage
Thomas Gleixner
[patch -mm 19/28] x86_64: Use generic cmos update
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 09/36] driver core: register_memory/unregister_memory clean ups and bugfix
git
:
Mark Junker
git on MacOSX and files with decomposed utf-8 file names
Johannes Schindelin
Re: error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/origin/*'
Pat Thoyts
[PATCH] git-gui: use themed tk widgets with Tk 8.5
Michael Witten
Re: 'git gc --aggressive' effectively unusable
Johannes Schindelin
Re: [PATCH 2/2] git-svn: support fetch with autocrlf on
linux-netdev
:
David Miller
Re: [PATCH 32/53] netns xfrm: finding policy in netns
Jean-Louis Dupond
Re: tg3 driver not advertising 1000mbit
Jan Engelhardt
[PATCH 1/3] net: tcp: make hybla selectable as default congestion module
Daniel Schaffrath
Re: tcp bw in 2.6
Matt Mackall
Re: [regression] nf_iterate(), BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference
git-commits-head
:
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB (8018): Add em2860 chip ID
Linux Kernel Mailing List
ipv6: fix an oops when force unload ipv6 module
Linux Kernel Mailing List
tracing: protect reader of cmdline output
Linux Kernel Mailing List
imxfb: Fix margin settings
Linux Kernel Mailing List
V4L/DVB (10826): cx88: Add IR support to pcHDTV HD3000 & HD5500
openbsd-misc
:
Stas Miasnikou
Re: Another question: device naming convention
Darrin Chandler
Re: That whole "Linux stealing our code" thing
Community First Financial
Teacher A+ Loan
Jan Stary
Re: audio recording levels
Andrej Elizarov
Re: Web Browsers
Colocation donated by:
Syndicate