Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flush IPI vector?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ingo Molnar
Date: Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 1:57 pm

* Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> wrote:


We'd still use the smp_send_reschdule(cpu) API, so it's an architecture 
detail. On x86 we'd use arch_send_call_function_single_ipi().

	Ingo
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flush IP ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Jul 28, 4:16 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Jul 28, 4:20 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Jul 28, 11:19 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Jul 28, 11:29 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jul 29, 7:46 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Jul 31, 10:48 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ..., Ingo Molnar, (Thu Jul 31, 1:57 pm)