Re: PCIe device driver question

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Robert Hancock
Date: Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 11:52 am

V.Radhakrishnan wrote:

I'm suspicious about this usage, I don't know if that will actually 
work. There is a dma_map_page call which is meant for doing a DMA 
mapping on a struct page which should likely be used instead.


Are you sure the address being passed to the device was correct in this 
case? There should be nothing magical about 896MB from a hardware point 
of view, and the kernel in general cannot stop you from DMAing anywhere 
you like.

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: PCIe device driver question, Robert Hancock, (Wed Jul 30, 12:21 pm)
Re: PCIe device driver question, V.Radhakrishnan, (Thu Jul 31, 6:11 am)
Re: PCIe device driver question, Robert Hancock, (Thu Jul 31, 10:37 am)
Re: PCIe device driver question, V.Radhakrishnan, (Thu Jul 31, 11:47 am)
Re: PCIe device driver question, Robert Hancock, (Thu Jul 31, 11:52 am)
Re: PCIe device driver question, V.Radhakrishnan, (Thu Jul 31, 1:47 pm)