Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flush IPI vector?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge
Date: Thursday, July 31, 2008 - 10:48 am

Peter Zijlstra wrote:

Is doing a no-op interrupt sufficient on all architectures?  Is there
some change a function call IPI might not go through the normal
reschedule interrupt exit path?

    J

--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flush IP ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Jul 28, 4:16 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Jul 28, 4:20 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Jul 28, 11:19 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Mon Jul 28, 11:29 pm)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Jul 29, 7:46 am)
Re: x86: Is there still value in having a special tlb flus ..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Thu Jul 31, 10:48 am)