* Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:

quoted text
> While thinking about David's patch it _finally_ dawned on me that 
> there is no reason we have a lock class per cpu..

/me arghs too! :)

quoted text
> Sorry for being dense :-/
> 
> The below changes the annotation from a lock class per cpu, to a 
> single nested lock, as the scheduler never holds more that 2 rq locks 
> at a time anyway.
> 
> If there was code requiring holding all rq locks this would not work 
> and the original annotation would be the only option, but that not 
> being the case, this is a much lighter one.
> 
> Compiles and boots on a 2-way x86_64.

applied to tip/sched/urgent - thanks Peter!

	Ingo
--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/