[PATCH 2/3] add per_cpu_dyn_array support

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Yinghai Lu
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 9:11 pm

so could make array in per_cpu is allocated dynamically too

Signed-off-by: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c    |    7 +++-
 include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h |    6 ++++
 include/linux/init.h              |   27 ++++++++++++++++--
 init/main.c                       |   57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 4 files changed, 92 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

Index: linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
+++ linux-2.6/arch/x86/kernel/setup_percpu.c
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ static void __init setup_cpu_pda_map(voi
  */
 void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
 {
-	ssize_t size = PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM;
+	ssize_t size, old_size;
 	char *ptr;
 	int cpu;
 
@@ -148,7 +148,8 @@ void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
 	setup_cpu_pda_map();
 
 	/* Copy section for each CPU (we discard the original) */
-	size = PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM;
+	old_size = PERCPU_ENOUGH_ROOM;
+	size = old_size + per_cpu_dyn_array_size();
 	printk(KERN_INFO "PERCPU: Allocating %zd bytes of per cpu data\n",
 			  size);
 
@@ -176,6 +177,8 @@ void __init setup_per_cpu_areas(void)
 		per_cpu_offset(cpu) = ptr - __per_cpu_start;
 		memcpy(ptr, __per_cpu_start, __per_cpu_end - __per_cpu_start);
 
+		per_cpu_alloc_dyn_array(cpu, ptr + old_size);
+
 	}
 
 	printk(KERN_DEBUG "NR_CPUS: %d, nr_cpu_ids: %d, nr_node_ids %d\n",
Index: linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
@@ -220,6 +220,12 @@
 		VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__dyn_array_start) = .;			\
 		*(.dyn_array.init)					\
 		VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__dyn_array_end) = .;			\
+	}								\
+	. = ALIGN((align));						\
+	.per_cpu_dyn_array.init : AT(ADDR(.per_cpu_dyn_array.init) - LOAD_OFFSET) {	\
+		VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__per_cpu_dyn_array_start) = .;		\
+		*(.per_cpu_dyn_array.init)				\
+		VMLINUX_SYMBOL(__per_cpu_dyn_array_end) = .;		\
 	}
 #define SECURITY_INIT							\
 	.security_initcall.init : AT(ADDR(.security_initcall.init) - LOAD_OFFSET) { \
Index: linux-2.6/include/linux/init.h
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/include/linux/init.h
+++ linux-2.6/include/linux/init.h
@@ -258,12 +258,13 @@ struct dyn_array {
         void (*init_work)(void *);
 };
 extern struct dyn_array *__dyn_array_start[], *__dyn_array_end[];
+extern struct dyn_array *__per_cpu_dyn_array_start[], *__per_cpu_dyn_array_end[];
 
-#define DEFINE_DYN_ARRAY(nameX, sizeX, nrX, alignX, init_workX) \
+#define DEFINE_DYN_ARRAY_ADDR(nameX, addrX, sizeX, nrX, alignX, init_workX) \
 		static struct dyn_array __dyn_array_##nameX __initdata = \
-		{	.name = (void **)&nameX,\
+		{	.name = (void **)&(nameX),\
 			.size = sizeX,\
-			.nr   = &nrX,\
+			.nr   = &(nrX),\
 			.align = alignX,\
 			.init_work = init_workX,\
 		}; \
@@ -271,7 +272,27 @@ extern struct dyn_array *__dyn_array_sta
 		__attribute__((__section__(".dyn_array.init"))) = \
 			&__dyn_array_##nameX
 
+#define DEFINE_DYN_ARRAY(nameX, sizeX, nrX, alignX, init_workX) \
+	DEFINE_DYN_ARRAY_ADDR(nameX, nameX, sizeX, nrX, alignX, init_workX)
+
+#define DEFINE_PER_CPU_DYN_ARRAY_ADDR(nameX, addrX, sizeX, nrX, alignX, init_workX) \
+		static struct dyn_array __per_cpu_dyn_array_##nameX __initdata = \
+		{	.name = (void **)&(addrX),\
+			.size = sizeX,\
+			.nr   = &(nrX),\
+			.align = alignX,\
+			.init_work = init_workX,\
+		}; \
+		static struct dyn_array *__per_cpu_dyn_array_ptr_##nameX __used \
+		__attribute__((__section__(".per_cpu_dyn_array.init"))) = \
+			&__per_cpu_dyn_array_##nameX
+
+#define DEFINE_PER_CPU_DYN_ARRAY(nameX, sizeX, nrX, alignX, init_workX) \
+	DEFINE_PER_CPU_DYN_ARRAY_ADDR(nameX, nameX, nrX, alignX, init_workX)
+
 extern void pre_alloc_dyn_array(void);
+extern unsigned long per_cpu_dyn_array_size(void);
+extern void per_cpu_alloc_dyn_array(int cpu, char *ptr);
 #endif /* __ASSEMBLY__ */
 
 /**
Index: linux-2.6/init/main.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/init/main.c
+++ linux-2.6/init/main.c
@@ -562,6 +562,63 @@ void pre_alloc_dyn_array(void)
 #endif
 }
 
+unsigned long per_cpu_dyn_array_size(void)
+{
+	unsigned long total_size = 0;
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_DYN_ARRAY
+	unsigned long size;
+	struct dyn_array **daa;
+
+	for (daa = __per_cpu_dyn_array_start ; daa < __per_cpu_dyn_array_end; daa++) {
+		struct dyn_array *da = *daa;
+
+		size = da->size * (*da->nr);
+		print_fn_descriptor_symbol("per_cpu_dyna_array %s ", da->name);
+		printk(KERN_CONT "size:%#lx nr:%d align:%#lx\n",
+			da->size, *da->nr, da->align);
+		total_size += roundup(size, da->align);
+	}
+	if (total_size)
+		printk(KERN_DEBUG "per_cpu_dyna_array total_size: %#lx\n",
+			 total_size);
+#endif
+	return total_size;
+}
+
+void per_cpu_alloc_dyn_array(int cpu, char *ptr)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_DYN_ARRAY
+	unsigned long size, phys;
+	struct dyn_array **daa;
+	unsigned long addr;
+	void **array;
+
+	phys = virt_to_phys(ptr);
+
+	for (daa = __per_cpu_dyn_array_start ; daa < __per_cpu_dyn_array_end; daa++) {
+		struct dyn_array *da = *daa;
+
+		size = da->size * (*da->nr);
+		print_fn_descriptor_symbol("per_cpu_dyna_array %s ", da->name);
+		printk(KERN_CONT "size:%#lx nr:%d align:%#lx",
+			da->size, *da->nr, da->align);
+
+		phys = roundup(phys, da->align);
+		addr = (unsigned long)da->name;
+		addr += per_cpu_offset(cpu);
+		array = (void **)addr;
+		*array = phys_to_virt(phys);
+		*da->name = *array; /* so init_work could use it directly */
+		printk(KERN_CONT " %p ==> [%#lx - %#lx]\n", array, phys, phys + size);
+		phys += size;
+
+		if (da->init_work) {
+			da->init_work(da);
+		}
+	}
+#endif
+}
+
 asmlinkage void __init start_kernel(void)
 {
 	char * command_line;
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86: 64bit support more than 256 irq v2, Yinghai Lu, (Tue Jul 29, 2:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: 64bit support more than 256 irq v2, Yinghai Lu, (Tue Jul 29, 3:16 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86: 64bit support more than 256 irq v2, Eric W. Biederman, (Tue Jul 29, 4:22 pm)
RFC [PATCH] x86: introduce nr_irqs for 64bit, Yinghai Lu, (Tue Jul 29, 9:38 pm)
Re: RFC [PATCH] x86: introduce nr_irqs for 64bit, Ingo Molnar, (Wed Jul 30, 3:09 am)
[PATCH] x86: introduce nr_irqs for 64bit v2, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Jul 30, 3:11 am)
Re: RFC [PATCH] x86: introduce nr_irqs for 64bit, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Jul 30, 3:16 am)
Re: RFC [PATCH] x86: introduce nr_irqs for 64bit, Mike Travis, (Wed Jul 30, 5:58 am)
[PATCH 0/7] dyn_array support, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Jul 30, 12:10 pm)
[PATCH 2/7] x86: introduce nr_irqs for 64bit v3, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Jul 30, 12:13 pm)
[PATCH 5/7] pci: make irq2_iommu to use dyn_array, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Jul 30, 12:16 pm)
[PATCH 7/7] x86: make 64bit support dyn_array, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Jul 30, 12:18 pm)
[PATCH 1/7] x86: 64bit support more than 256 irq v1, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Jul 30, 12:27 pm)
[PATCH 3/7] add dyn_array support, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Jul 30, 12:37 pm)
[PATCH 6/7] irq: make irq_desc to use dyn_array, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Jul 30, 12:40 pm)
[PATCH 0/3] dyn_array support #2, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Jul 30, 9:09 pm)
[PATCH 2/3] add per_cpu_dyn_array support, Yinghai Lu, (Wed Jul 30, 9:11 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/3] serial: change irq_lists to use dyn_array, Eric W. Biederman, (Wed Jul 30, 10:58 pm)
[PATCH] serial: change remove NR_IRQS in 8250.c, Yinghai Lu, (Thu Jul 31, 1:26 am)
[PATCH] x86 remove irq_vectors_limit.h, Yinghai Lu, (Thu Jul 31, 3:14 am)
Re: [PATCH] serial: change remove NR_IRQS in 8250.c, Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Jul 31, 4:50 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] dyn_array support #2, Mike Travis, (Thu Jul 31, 9:32 am)
Re: [PATCH] serial: change remove NR_IRQS in 8250.c, Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Jul 31, 11:10 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] dyn_array support #2, Yinghai Lu, (Thu Jul 31, 11:21 am)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] dyn_array support #2, Peter Zijlstra, (Thu Jul 31, 2:51 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] dyn_array support #2, Yinghai Lu, (Thu Jul 31, 3:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] dyn_array support #2, Eric W. Biederman, (Thu Jul 31, 3:14 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] dyn_array support #2, Yinghai Lu, (Thu Jul 31, 3:25 pm)
Re: [PATCH] serial: change remove NR_IRQS in 8250.c, Yinghai Lu, (Thu Jul 31, 8:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/3] dyn_array support #2, Yinghai Lu, (Thu Jul 31, 8:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH 0/7] dyn_array support, Eric W. Biederman, (Fri Aug 1, 1:13 pm)