Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Jonathan Corbet
Date: Wednesday, July 30, 2008 - 1:56 pm

On Wed, 30 Jul 2008 13:09:13 +0200 (CEST)
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz> wrote:


Clearly it's been known to happen (can you say GRU?).  But I don't know
that has ever really been adopted as an "official" policy.  My
preference would be to lay down the merge window rules as a fairly firm
thing rather than suggest to people that there might be ways to slip
around them sometimes.  But, certainly, I'm not tied to that if we want
to send a different message.

Thanks,

jon
--
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Jonathan Corbet, (Tue Jul 29, 1:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Andrew Morton, (Wed Jul 30, 12:15 am)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Jiri Kosina, (Wed Jul 30, 4:09 am)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Takashi Iwai, (Wed Jul 30, 9:05 am)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Jonathan Corbet, (Wed Jul 30, 11:05 am)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Jonathan Corbet, (Wed Jul 30, 1:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Roland Dreier, (Wed Jul 30, 2:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Jiri Kosina, (Wed Jul 30, 2:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Alex Chiang, (Wed Jul 30, 11:23 pm)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Jochen Voß, (Thu Jul 31, 5:22 am)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Jonathan Corbet, (Thu Jul 31, 9:17 am)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Jonathan Corbet, (Thu Jul 31, 9:30 am)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Daniel Barkalow, (Thu Jul 31, 10:49 am)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Randy.Dunlap, (Thu Jul 31, 10:57 am)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Jake Edge, (Thu Jul 31, 4:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Stefan Richter, (Fri Aug 1, 3:35 am)
Re: [PATCH, RFC] A development process document, Daniel Barkalow, (Fri Aug 1, 9:52 am)